Crime and Lawsuits

I accept the goal of British Law is to deal fast information out of the suspect before having a lawyer present. The know that many bulk who are arrested do non render enough specie to afford lawyers so if they thatt become them say stuff that may hurt the suspects defend or for them non to say anything they would be saving money from lawyer fees. I may be way transfer with this but this is what I think. A police officer in the Unites States says You have the rightly hand to remain silent. Anything you say discharge be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to have an attorney present now and during any likely questioning. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you raw of charge if you wish. Do you understand what has been read to you? The differences between the US and Britain is that US is express anything you use will be held against you and Britain is adage if you choose to stay silent it may hurt you in your court room trial. Personally I prefer the US version Britains version is a little confusing. I retrieve there are way too many lawsuits in the US.

I mean you can sue from slipping douse some stairs to have food from a eating house and claiming there food made them sick. I bill the individuals because intimately individuals can not afford lawyers and there soaring fees I think the only way to help with the modus operandi of lawsuits is to sidetrack charging a large deposit in tier to accuse a lawsuit in order to defend the numbers of lawsuits down. If they win the case you get your deposit backr est if not the deposit goes to the court. ! This will make sure people are thinking smart about what to sue everyplace and put across them a second to ask themselves is this something I really engage to take to court or can I pull off on my own.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay